Hard disk or solid-state? Think again
Though solid-state drives are in vogue, market forces and technical issues are giving the venerable hard-disk drive new life.
DRAMexchange, a Taipei-based market intelligence firm, said last week that the adoption of solid-state drives by computer vendors has slowed as the price of the NAND chips--the raw material of solid-state drives--has increased. The firm also said that computer makers have been cautious about using solid-state drives because current Windows operating systems are not fully optimized for SSDs.
Numonyx NAND flash chip
(Credit: Numonyx)And the popularity of flash storage is waning in Netbooks. These tiny laptops at one time used solid-state drives almost exclusively. But Acer, Hewlett-Packard, Dell and others are moving en masse to configurations with large hard-disk drives in lieu of smaller-capacity solid-state drives.
SSDs typically offer higher performance--often much higher performance--than hard-disk drives and are more durable since they have no moving parts.
While those merits still apply, lingering doubts about the long-term retention of the data in a solid-state drive is making the hard disk look not quite so pass?. Ed Doller, the chief technical officer of Numonyx, a flash memory chip maker which was spun off from Intel and STMicroelectronics last year, addressed this issue in a recent phone interview. Numonyx makes two kinds of flash: NOR, used for storing computer programs, and NAND, used widely as a data storage medium in digital cameras, media players, smartphones, and solid-state drives.
"It's if versus when. With a hard drive it's if it's going to fail. With an SSD, it's when is it going to fail," Doller said, who critiques NAND only because his company is looking for a new storage medium--such as phase change memory--that can overcome some of NAND's inherent limitations.
Doller spoke about an epiphany he had after booting up a 20-year-old IBM AT. "I fired that thing up and it actually booted from the hard drive. If that same computer had been built with a solid-state drive, I can almost guarantee you that would not have worked. It would have lost its information over that period of time," Doller said.
Doller says NAND storage will get even more dicey as the densities increase--squeezing more memory cells into smaller areas. NAND is classified as a non-volatile memory device because it won't lose its data contents when the computer is turned off--just like a hard disk drive. Dynamic random access memory, or DRAM, used as the main memory in all PCs, does lose its contents when the computer is powered off.
"When you're talking about a non-volatile memory device, there's really only two things that matter. The first one being how many times can you write (data) to the device. And the second is how long will the data be in the device," he said. "Over time we've given up in the areas of those two very important parameters," he said.
Doller continued. "It's one thing to produce a 34-nanometer NAND device that's good enough for a card for your phone. It's another thing to say that I'm going to sell that same 34-nanometer to somebody who's going to build a solid-state drive for the (corporate) enterprise."
Controller chips, integrated into the flash memory device, can mitigate the shortcomings of flash-based storage by managing how the data is stored, Doller said. For example, moving stored data around the device--called "wear leveling"--to avoid using one area of the disk over and over again. For solid-state drive suppliers like Samsung and Intel, the controller chip is the secret sauce for not only managing how the data is stored but boosting performance.
The problem, according to Doller, is that the user must implicitly trust the designer and manufacturer of the drive. "Whoever is building that drive has to have very intricate knowledge of how you and your operating system are using that non-volatile memory," he said. If the SSD technology is not top-notch, disk failure can occur.
Phase change memory--the next phase?
What Numonyx's solution? Phase change memory. Last week, Samsung and Numonyx announced they are jointly developing market specifications for phase change memory (PCM) products. Phase change memory can read and write data very quickly at lower power than conventional NOR and NAND flash memory, and single bits can be changed to either 1 or 0 without the need to first erase an entire block of cells--a shortcoming of flash.
Phase change memory will also be "executable", allowing a separation of code and data for reliable code storage--particularly useful in handsets.
Sounds good, right? But phase change memory has one big problem. Chipmakers have been talking about phase change for decades. Companies typically develop a phase change prototype and tout its merits, then do not follow through.
Doller has a Trojan horse strategy.
"Put some PCM into that (solid-state) drive to make it easier for you to manage the media behind it. Once the PCM gets in there--maybe it's one percent, two percent of the overall memory--my belief is that it will act like a Trojan horse. Once it is in there customers will understand it improves reliability, it improves performance," he said.
This will increase demand, forcing manufacturers to ramp up production and, eventually, bring down costs in line with flash memory.
Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure. 




They will always be SLIGHLY more expensive than a regular mechanical hard drive, but the speed increases are WORTH IT!
People today are using quad-core systems with loads of ram and and gigabytes of harddrive space and all that cost less then what an original 120Mhz Pentium system with 4mb of ram and a 1gig harddrive cost back in '95.
Umm... no. It is 'when' as well with a HDD, I have never had one of those suckers last more than 5 years. Granted, I do some fairly disk intensive stuff (audio, mostly), but the question is most definitely not 'if' a HDD will fail. Regardless of what you are using for storage, backup, backup, backup...
Another point I think he was making was that you can yank a HD and let it set on the shelf for a few years and when you hook it back up it will more than likely work just fine. Again, with a SSD that is not nearly as likely.
With a hard drive, the magnetic domains are permanent until they are changed by a sufficiently strong magnetic field. The motor or other components may break, but the data will still be safe on the platters.
This is especially prevalent in the example given: a computer that has not been turned on in years. Most HDDs will work just as well if stored properly. A SSD has been losing charge over time and can be guaranteed not to have any readable data (even forensically) after a certain time.
The comment is just asking to be proven wrong. Anyone using a PC older then two years can attest to that. The older and working harddrives for sale on e-bay can also act as proof. I agree, harddrives are mechanical devices and like all machanical devices they will eventually wear out, but storage technology wouldn't have progressed to where it is today if harddrives were really as unreliable as you imply it is.
On SSD, a lot will hinge on whether it is SLC or MLC. Data retention on SLC is pretty good up to fifteen years. Early MLC (2 bit) was ten years. Current (4 bit) MLC is five. Five years is pretty short for retention time if you ask me.
SSD last far shorter than any good HDD
SSD's have a set number of read/write cycles before they die
The motor on an HDD also has a practical lifetime as well. Google did a study a while back and found that 12% of HDDs in their test died in the first year.
Given enough time though I think that SSDs will end up taking over the netbook space much like they have taken over the MP3 player market (save for the iPod classic the HDD based MP3 player is nearly defunct). Due to the small size of the screens storage for high def video, high end games, 3d modeling, video editing, etc. are non-issues since one will never likely do any of those tasks on such a machine. Once 128GB SSDs drop below $100, which may be as little as a year away, I think that we will start to see a revived interest in SSDs on netbooks.
SSD's are a whole 'nother ball of wax together and those critters require a different set of tacticsentirely. The drives I've sent out for recovery come back with estimates of $15-20K. That's just a whole lot of money for a laptop that only cost $1200 to start with.
I never heard anything more asinine as the customer I had who was willing to spend $5k to recover data but originally wouldn't spend ~$100 for a backup harddrive. In my opinion, if it wasn't important enough to backup then it's not important enough to recover.
You have two choices in automobiles. 1) Normal average 2009 model. Cost $30,000. 2) New vehicle. Cost $100,000. Same size as option 1. Option 2 never gets stuck in traffic, gets 10 times the gas mileage, has it's own lanes on all highways which allow top speeds of 200 mph, but will only last you 5 years before you have to replace it.
The benefits are clear for option 2. If I could afford it, I'd buy option 2. If I couldn't afford it, I'd sit around pointing out how it costs too much and how it will only last for 5 years.
SSDs are amazing. It's like night and day compared to a hard drive. Ask anyone that has one produced in the last year or two. They're pricey. It's doubtful the price will come down to HD price anytime soon. They won't last as long as a HD in theory (I say that because I've had my share of HDs go bad before the expected lifespan on an SSD). But MAN are they nice. Every day, day in and day out, I'm pleased with how fast my system responds with the SSD. Programs load faster, the system boots faster, patches install faster (yes, the writes are faster for me), everything just runs faster.
Sit on the sidelines all you want and talk about the problems they exhibit after years of stellar performance. I'll be running laps around you with my SSD. :)
Hell if a SSD even lasted that long alot of people wouldn't have a problem but the lifespan of them is like 2-3
None of the "flaws" mentioned in this piece are news at all.... the limitations of SSD are very well known.
The reason notebook manufacturers are moving away (for now) from SSD is simply cost... and cost is going to fluctuate as the cost of NAND chips moves. Anyone who has been watching the industry for any length of time ought to know this.
SSD is going to be the subject of massive R&D investment over the next decade, and there are some pretty obvious reasons why traditional HDD's aren't going to take us much further - A traditional HDD is essentially a rack of spinning aluminium disks coated in rust... There comes a point when the laws of physics intervene to prevent you from getting more bits onto a square centimetre of that rust (to whit - the little pointy things are simply so close together that they begin to interfere with eachother).
Players like IBM (the people who invented the Winchester Drive (in Winchester - England) are burning the midnight oil to figure out how to address the challenge that storage represents.
SSD - even current gen SSD has a huge future - not necesarily as long-term storage - But as super-fast front-end storage for things like databases (which are typically written to few times but read from many) - Thing of SSD as a way to speed up your server (dramatically) by providing a very fast second tier of persistent cache - With long term storage done on those painfully slow spinning disks of rust, and the super-fast access on SSD.
This article would have been much much better if it had included an interview with someone other than the guy from Numonyx... I would be happy to point the author of this piece to a couple of really hard-core experts on storage if he'd like?
So SSDs are not perfect yet but give it time. Perhaps a SSD with a batery backup system or a small solar pannel who knows what they will think of but we should all be excited about what speed the future holds & look forward to an instant loading OS.
- by tundraboy July 21, 2009 10:46 AM PDT
- My disenchantment with flash memory goes back to the day my daughter lost 15 excellent close up shops of a bald eagle that she took on a field trip. One second they were there in the SD card, the next, they were gone. And it's not so much that the SD card degrades, it's that there's no way you can predict when it would happen.
- Reply to this comment
-
(35 Comments)